How can you maximize the probability of excelling with your idea? How likely is that, in the long run, you will be the only one to always make the best decisions, execute them to perfection, and realize the way the future is going to shape up? Because that is what closed source is about: jealously guarding your program’s code, stopping your best employees from ever getting help or discussing the inner workings of what they are writing with anybody. That likelihood is close to zero, and that approach is not the best way to succeed.

There is an area that has long realized this, and it is that of computer security. The ‘security through obscurity‘ approach has been long abandoned: there is nobody who would trust today an algorithm that wasn’t tried out a tested by others. Only by opening up the algorithms to close scrutiny it is possible to trust it, as it will be universally recognized as uncracked, if not uncrackable.

A similar approach is being adopted in the field of operating systems, where Linux was one of the first to make this popular for personal computers. Mobile phones have long appeared to resist this tendency towards openness, given also their vertically integrated approach from spectrum licensing to handset sales. But recently, with the efforts of Google on both spectrum allocation, and of operating system development, things have changed dramatically.

Yesterday Nokia, the worlds largest mobile phone handset manufacturer, announced that they are buying the entirety of Symbian, the company controlling the operating system that runs on Nokia phones, and putting it in open source. This is a great move, one that enables Nokia to embrace a community oriented approach that is necessary today.

So it seems that there are two main camps in the mobile phone operating system markets, who will be fighting it out in the future for the chance of becoming the engine for the next few billion devices. On one hand the proprietary approaches of Microsoft, and Apple. On the other hand the open approaches of Google, and Nokia. It can’t but benefit us all, as these compete to make ever more powerful, and easier to use mobile phones we will all live with!

That is why we hope that OpenSpime.org will be able and become, growing from a repository of code, and documentation which it is today, to a place where people, corporations, and organizations can discuss the future of a healthy and desirable development of an Open Internet Of Things. Come, and join the discussion about OpenSpime, and the future of our technologies, and policies!

It is only through the creativity and inventiveness of the community of developers that OpenSpime will succeed! This is why we are excited that so many have already subscribed to the OpenSpime Developer Network.

Together with the launch of the network we also are releasing a first implementation of the protocol in Python, which can be used to quickly prototype applications on a variety of platforms. You can also find explanatory videos that describe the OpenSpime protocol, and the way the PyOpenSpime implementation works.

The Economist has published an excellent article “Open sesame“in its most recent Technology Quarterly about open source hardware, and how different businesses take advantage of it:

“…an emerging class of electronic devices, for which the specifications have been made public, so that enthusiasts can suggest refinements, write and share software improvements, and even build their own devices from scratch. This is not as daft as it sounds. Even if all the details needed to build something are available, few people will have the tools or the inclination to do so….”